Existing advisers should re-think exiting

2 August 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Experienced advisers are choosing to exit the financial planning industry due to the new education requirements when there is an overwhelming need to address complex financial issues among senior clients, according to Mentor Education Group.

Mentor Education Group founder and managing director, Dr Mark Sinclair, said there was a considerable vacuum of expertise in the provision of quality financial advice to meet the pre, and post retirement needs and longevity risk of senior clients.

“Far too many planners have decided that the regulatory requirement for academic qualifications is a ‘line in the sand’ and their cue to turn their backs on a career and advice practices that have many more productive years ahead,” Sinclair said.

Senior clients are going to need advice on various aspects including addressing sequencing risk, making nest eggs last the distance, superannuation and strategies to bridge the financial longevity gap.

“This need is going to increase drastically as more and more Baby Boomer workers and business owners exit the workforce and find themselves facing a myriad of often complex and bewildering issues and challenges to address in retirement,” Sinclair said.

Sinclair said advisers who were contemplating exiting due to the new educational requirements should change their thinking as the commercial benefits far outweighed the downsides.

“The reality is that existing planners still have time on their side to complete a bachelor degree by the 2019 deadline or undertake studies in other fields that can allow them to be of service to senior consumers facing a rapidly growing and complex number of financial related scenarios,” Sinclair said.

He also warned of the consequences of a sudden reduction in the number of financial planners that would affect tens of thousands of clients and hundreds of small business owners, and the effect on employees of advice practices who would have to be shed.

“It simply makes no sense when there is both a growing consumer demand and market for the services of experienced planners – as well as practical and workable alternatives to selling an advice practice at fire sale prices,” Sinclair said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 12 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 13 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 12 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND