An end to planning’s golden age?

The golden age of financial planning business valuations may have peaked with a combination of the Royal Commission, the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime and tighter regulation spelling particular trouble for practices reliant on grandfathered commissions and operating under an institutional licensee.

That is the bottom line assessment of leading business brokerage and consultancy firm, Chase Corporate Advisory with executive directors, Greg Quinn and Marcelo Fernandez producing an analysis which squarely points to the sellers’ market of the past five years and average premium valuations of 3.2 to 3.5 times becoming more problematic.

The pair predicted that, in the future, there would be greater polarisation in both the quality of financial planning firms and the valuation multiples those firms ultimately attract. However, they suggested that predictions of up to 57 per cent of advisers departing the industry as being probably excessive.

Related News:

In doing so, they exampled a mid-sized financial planning firm in a large institutionally-owned AFSL with a Buyer of Last Resort (BOLR) valuation and a material level of trail commissions from super and investment products and the principles approaching retirement age in the next five years.

“Our advice to this type of firm would be to consider their options either under their BOLR arrangement or a contested trade sale as soon as possible,” the analysis said. “These types of firms face the greatest future valuation downside risk as either their existing trail commission will continue to come under scrutiny or will require a significant amount of work to re-engage clients and convert them into on-going fee-paying clients.”

The analysis also pointed to problems for firms with internal product integration (IMA/SMA/MDA or use licensee products) stating there was a real risk that recommendations from the Royal Commission would adversely impact such firms.

“These recommendations and subsequent legislation will most likely require you to engage in some restructuring to enable you to continue with your existing arrangements,” the analysis said. “At the moment the Royal Commission is looking at both vertically and horizontally integrated models with a view to eliminating both the perceived and real conflicts of interests within these models.”

On the upside, the Chase Corporate analysis pointed to a better outlook for mid-to large-sized financial planning businesses with 80 to 90 per cent derived from ongoing advice fees rather than trail commissions with “engaged clients in solid value proposition”.

“We expect that these firms will continue to attract a premium valuation into the future. These are generally firms that have already positioned themselves for the future and are ahead of the competition,” it said.




Related Content

Trail commissions not for ongoing service says AFA

Grandfathered investment and superannuation product trail commissions are declining in influence and should be allowed to continue, according to the A...Read more

One in four Aussies look to change banks post-Commission

The Royal Commission has convinced one in four Australians to change or consider changing banks, an Essential Media poll has revealed, providing posit...Read more

ASIC: Trails equate to ongoing fees

While the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has argued that grandfathered trail commissions do not equate to ongoing service arrangements, the A...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

The BOLR is myth, the institutions mothball the clients or don't want to with them or no one to sell to them, or they fall away and the price received declines rapidly over the 2-3 year payout period, you end up with the what the market would have paid upfront, if you're lucky.

no-one is paying anywhere near that number... 2.2 to 2.6 for a solid book. and shrinking as the grandfathering question remains unanswered

Add new comment