Duty of care canvassed for ratings houses
An industry round table examining the future licensing of ratings agencies has actively canvassed imposing a duty of care on the agencies with respect to retail investors.
The idea has been revealed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in its analysis of a number of industry round tables held to examine the possibilities for the new regulatory and licensing environment.
Referring to what amounted to imposing a duty of care, the ASIC analysis said such a move could improve their accountability for poor or ineffective ratings, arguably improving ratings.
It said, however, it had been noted that introducing a duty of credit rating agencies to investors might lead to credit rating agencies potentially leaving the market.
“In addition, any court action would be costly and lengthy if such legal action did eventuate,” the ASIC analysis said.
In its final recommendations, the regulator steered clear of the duty of care proposals saying it would consider possible options for investor education addressing over-reliance on credit ratings and continue to work with credit rating agencies in progressing their Australian Financial Service License applications.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a financial adviser after he allegedly concealed information from clients and misused client funds, among other breaches.
Disgraced adviser Joshua Fuoco described himself as the “biggest monkey” at AFSL Group and provided financial advice via WhatsApp, all while being banned for 10 years, court documents show.
The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort has released the FY26 revised levy estimate, but the FAAA is concerned costs will be pushed into the following year.
Former Iress chief executive, Andrew Walsh, has been promoted to chair of a boutique Sydney advisory firm, having stepped down from the same position at Mason Stevens.
