Duty of care canvassed for ratings houses
An industry round table examining the future licensing of ratings agencies has actively canvassed imposing a duty of care on the agencies with respect to retail investors.
The idea has been revealed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in its analysis of a number of industry round tables held to examine the possibilities for the new regulatory and licensing environment.
Referring to what amounted to imposing a duty of care, the ASIC analysis said such a move could improve their accountability for poor or ineffective ratings, arguably improving ratings.
It said, however, it had been noted that introducing a duty of credit rating agencies to investors might lead to credit rating agencies potentially leaving the market.
“In addition, any court action would be costly and lengthy if such legal action did eventuate,” the ASIC analysis said.
In its final recommendations, the regulator steered clear of the duty of care proposals saying it would consider possible options for investor education addressing over-reliance on credit ratings and continue to work with credit rating agencies in progressing their Australian Financial Service License applications.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Compared to four years ago when the divide between boutique and large licensees were largely equal, adviser movements have seen this trend shift in light of new licensees commencing.
As ongoing market uncertainty sees advisers look beyond traditional equity exposure, Fidante has found adviser interest in small caps and emerging markets for portfolio returns has almost doubled since April.
CoreData has shared the top areas of demand for cryptocurrency advice but finds investors are seeking advisers who actively invest in the asset themselves.
With regulators ‘raising the bar’ on retirement planning, Lonsec Research and Ratings has urged advisers to place greater focus on sequencing and longevity risk as they navigate clients through the shifting landscape.
