Consumers in the dark on compensation
When misconduct from within the financial services industry leads to investor loss and hardship, investors are often unaware of existing avenues of redress and do not pursue legal action.
That is one of the key findings from a research paper commissioned by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) that aims to uncover the social impact resulting from misconduct in the financial services industry, and personal consequences when investors are not fully compensated.
The clients of financial planners had no idea that they had any recourse except to take individual legal action, for example their financial service provider’s internal dispute resolution system, or external avenues such as the Financial Ombudsman Service, the research found.
Only some investors who had been pushed almost to the limit initiated legal action, while many were reluctant to pursue such action as they blamed themselves for their losses, the report stated.
Investors who suffered most were over-invested, under-diversified or too heavily geared, and most losses were associated with a product that was frozen or collapsed, the report stated.
Unsurprisingly those who suffered monetary loss lost confidence in the Australian financial system, financial advisers, the Government and regulators including ASIC.
In cases where ASIC took legal action on behalf of consumers they were compensated more fully and more quickly, according to ASIC senior executive leader, consumer, advisers and retail investors, Delia Rickard.
“Financial advisers must properly respond to complaints, especially when markets are turbulent,” she said.
“Licensees should also advise their clients of the right to complain to external dispute resolution schemes on their websites, in disclosure documents and more crucially when handling complaints,” Rickard said.
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.
