Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Call for single planner regulatory regime

financial-services-council/FSC/Tax-Practitioners-Board/TPB/association-of-financial-advisers/AFA/smsf-association/regulation/FASEA/

5 July 2019
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

There should be a single regulatory and oversight regime for financial advisers, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).

The FSC has used a submission to Treasury’s review of the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) to argue for a simplification of the regulatory environment in circumstances where the so-called “Tax Financial Adviser’ (TFA) regime predicated the establishment of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) and other changes to the industry.

It said the Treasury review of the TPB therefore provided an important opportunity to align and streamline the two regulatory regimes applicable to financial advisers into a single regime for the benefit of financial advisers and consumers.

In doing so the FSC echoed at least some of the views of both the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and the SMSF Association which had both pointed to the problems and costs associated with regulatory overlap.

“We believe that a single regulatory regime, which incorporates TFA requirements into the FASEA regime, benefits consumers and advisers alike,” the FSC submission said. “It provides consumer clarity and confidence that they need only engage with the FASEA regime should they have any concerns in relation to professional conduct breaches (instead of dealing with two separate bodies for the same advice) and reduces the regulator overlap and cost inefficiencies that arises from having two very separate but overlapping regimes.”

“We recommend that the TFA requirements be incorporated into the FASEA regime. Further consultation can identify the best way to incorporate TFA requirements and establish an ongoing TPB and FASEA engagement framework,” it said.

The FSC submission said the rationale for consolidating TFA requirements into the FASEA regime was further supported by the consideration that all financial advisers are subject to the FASEA regime but not all financial advisers are TFAs.

“As such, it makes sense to consolidate the TFA regime into FASEA such that the requirements apply to all advisers,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 weeks ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

4 weeks ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3