BEAR will make bank wealth and insurance uncompetitive
Including wealth management and insurance operations within the terms of the Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) will hamper their ability to compete, according to the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA).
Calling for a six-month extension to the implementation time-table for the BEAR, ABA chief executive, Anna Bligh said that, according to the legislation, BEAR would not only apply to banks but to all their subsidiaries as well.
“Large banks have hundreds of subsidiaries therefore the regime would capture a large number of mid-level and junior executives,” she said. “If banks’ insurance and wealth management businesses are also caught up in the regime it will affect banks’ ability to compete.”
“The draft legislation proposes that APRA can disqualify a person, effectively destroying their career, and doesn’t allow the person to have that life-changing decision reviewed to make sure the law was applied consistently,” Bligh said. Protecting an individual’s rights and ensuring procedural fairness is essential if the BEAR itself is seen to have integrity and consistency with other laws in Australia.”
“To achieve this the ABA strongly recommends that the merits of any disqualification decision by APRA must be able to be reviewed, and that APRA has to apply to the Federal Court to disqualify an individual,” she said.
What constitutes a breach is also unclear in the legislation, with no definition provided of behaviour that affects ‘prudential standing’ or ‘reputation’.
“Neither of these terms are defined, nor do they have an equivalent in any other law,” Bligh said.
“With so much important detail still to be worked out by the Federal Government and regulators, the banking industry is seeking an additional six months to implement BEAR (1 January 2019), or one year after the finalisation of all relevant APRA rules,” she said.
Recommended for you
An FAAA recommendation to make PY advisers subject to non-compete clauses would place candidates in a “hostage situation” with their employer and potentially deter new entrants, say commentators.
While the profession struggles to keep up with strong consumer demand, a third of people who have passed the ASIC adviser exam aren’t actively practising, so where is this missing third?
Half a year after Count Financial told its advisers to exit several Metrics Credit Partners funds, research house Lonsec has now downgraded two of these products over governance concerns.
As the advice industry evolves with technology, two business consultants have said successful advice firms will be those which focus on delivering an “experience” for their clients, beyond just a transactional service.
