ASIC declares end to Storm litigation
The principals of Storm Financial, Emmanuel and Julie Cassimatis have been hit with civil penalties of $70,000 each.
In a Federal Court prosecution which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said had brought to an end its Storm-related litigation, the Cassimatises were also disqualified from managing corporations for seven years.
ASIC noted that the actions undertaken with respect to the collapse of Storm had seen investors receiving compensation in relation to losses suffered on investments.
The ASIC release said Storm Financial operated a system of advice, created by the Cassimatises, in which 'Stormified' clients were advised to invest substantial amounts in index funds, using 'double gearing' (Storm Model).
It noted that clients would usually take out a home loan and a margin loan in order to purchase units in index funds, create a 'cash dam' and pay Storm's fees. Clients were then encouraged to take 'step' investments over time. In late 2008 and early 2009, many of Storm's clients were in negative equity positions, sustaining significant losses.
In the original judgment, Justice Edelman had found that a sample of investors who were advised to invest in accordance with the Storm Model, received advice that was inappropriate to their personal circumstances.
Each of those investors were over 50 years old, were retired or approaching and planning for retirement, had little or limited income, few assets and had little or no prospect of rebuilding their financial position in the event of suffering significant loss.
Justice Edelman found that the Cassimatises had each engaged in a course of conduct which amounted to one breach of the requirement that they exercise their powers as directors with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would have exercised in that situation. The maximum penalty for a breach of directors' duties (section 180) is $200,000.
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
