APRA flags capital requirement changes
|
|
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has signalled fundamental changes around the capital requirements for life insurers, describing the new regime as being simpler and more risk-sensitive.
The regulator flagged the changes in a discussion paper released this week dealing with the capital standards of both life and general insurers, but acknowledged that the changes being proposed for life companies were “more fundamental”.
APRA executive member John Trowbridge said the changes were expected to result in a number of benefits to the general and life insurance industries.
“The proposed new capital requirements for life insurers are simpler and more risk-sensitive than the current arrangements, as well as easier for all stakeholders to understand and work with in both substance and presentation.”
Detailing the changes proposed for the life industry, Trowbridge said APRA proposed to simplify the current dual reporting requirements for solvency and capital adequacy and align the capital structure for life insurers more closely with the capital structure for authorised deposit-taking institutions and general insurers in Australia.
He said this improved alignment of capital requirements would also facilitate adoption of APRA’s proposed supervisory framework for conglomerate groups.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
A panel of advisers have argued charging fees accordingly is a top priority for the industry, but Peloton Partners has found firms are reluctant to increase them until the business pressure is “unavoidable”.
Equal weighted ETFs are gaining ground with financial advisers, according to AUSIEX, as they believe they can bring balance to client portfolios.
Financial services software and technology provider Fin365 has appointed a new executive chairman to the board to support the firm’s strategic growth plans.
The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to switch their superannuation into a poorly performing product.
