AFA says RC hit the wrong targets

AFA wrong targets RC Royal Commission small businesses financial planning industry association of financial advisers phil kewin big businesses banks mortgage brokers LIF life insurance framework review financial advice on life insurance life insurance

8 February 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Small businesses within the financial planning industry were not given an appropriate chance to defend themselves in the Royal Commission, according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

In a full response to the Royal Commission recommendations, AFA chief executive, Phil Kewin argued that while the commission may have been aiming at the banks and big business it was small business financial advisers and mortgage brokers who had been hit.

“Business valuations for financial advice and mortgage broking small businesses, many of which are family owned and run, will be significantly impacted,” he said. “As a result of recent ongoing reforms and further recommendations from the Royal Commission, many small businesses are now under threat. This also further threatens the accessibility of affordable advice.”

“If the financial advice profession was on trial at the Royal Commission, then financial advisers should have been given the chance to defend themselves.  Regrettably the Royal Commission took evidence from large institutions and not the small business sector,” Mr Kewin said.  

On the question of the Royal Commission’s view on life insurance commissions, the AFA chief executive said while his organisation welcomed the recommendation that they should remain unchanged in the lead up to the review of the Life Insurance Framework (LIF), “it rejects the Royal Commission’s clearly expressed preference that they should be further reduced and in fact removed, following this ASIC review, particularly given there was no informed debate on this issue”. 
 
“Commissions are the internationally accepted method of remuneration for the provision of financial advice on life insurance, and this model works in the interests of consumers by reducing the cost of obtaining quality life insurance and advice,” Kewin said. “They are a form of remuneration, not an incentive, that pays for far more than just product placement, something we pointed out in several submissions to the Royal Commission.”

The AFA chief executive also complained that the Royal Commission’s final report had not corrected key errors the AFA had pointed to in its interim report.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Graeme

FWIW I am a long term holder of both. I am relaxed about my LICs trading at a discount. Part of a cycle. I would like...

2 days 14 hours ago
Ross Smith

The term "The democratisation of private assets continues to gain steam" is marketing misleading. There is no democracy...

2 days 16 hours ago
Greg

I have passed this exam, and it is not easy or fair exam. It's no wonder that advisers are falsifying their results. ...

5 days 16 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND