0.5% levy cap urged for any compensation scheme of last resort

federal-government/CSLR/compensation-scheme-of-last-resort/IMAP/

14 February 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government’s proposed compensation scheme of last resort (CSLR) should be funded by all industry participants and should be based on a levy capped at 0.5% of revenue, according to the Institute of Managed Account Professionals (IMAP).

In a submission filed in response to a Treasury discussion paper on the CSLR, the IMAP is recommending broad coverage for claimants extending across advice, investment product losses, personal lending losses and superannuation, but not including bank liabilities.

It said compensation should be available for retail and wholesale investors in Australia where they had less than $10 million invested, but that the compensation should be aligned to the limit applying to the bank despite guarantee scheme – $250,000.

“IMAP recommends a levy which is based on funds under advice, administration, management or lent and the levy must be capped for each organisation to avoid severe contingent liability issues and IMAP recommends this be 0.5% of revenue,” the submission said.

In doing so it recommended a tiered compensation scheme structured around a pool to meet claims in any year of $100 million, catastrophe insurance to cover claims in any year or from a single event between $100 million and $1 billion and Government funding for any claims in a single year in excess of $1 billion “on the grounds that this is symptomatic of regulatory failure”.

The IMAP submission also warns that the creation of a pool of funds to be used to compensate people for adverse financial outcomes will create both risks and complex, particularly when the pool can be replenished by incremental or subsequent levies on those who remain in business but were not involved in causing the compensated losses.

Among the factors raised by IMAP was the possibility that precisely those organisations most likely to cause a claim on the CSLR were likely to promote the existence of the scheme as a way of promoting their services.

It also suggested that the existence of the CSLR might reduce the level of caution which an investor ought to exhibit in their decision-making.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo