Count outlines fee-for-service approach

financial-planning/accounting/fee-for-service/

5 January 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Margin for error is a vital part of any fee-for-service financial advice model, according to an analysis published by Count Financial Limited.

In an article aimed at informing its member accounting firms, Count has cited the fee for service methodology used by accounting and wealth management firm, Cox Partners arguing that as well as ensuring price transparency for clients, this [fee for service] model enables advisers to price each service based on the complexity of work required.

The article cites Cox Partners financial planner, Hayden Lewis as stating that "pricing advice is part science, part intuition — and definitely not a case of set and forget"

It said that while professional services firms had traditionally used time-based pricing models, with clients charged an hourly rate, many firms were now recognising the benefits of using a fee-for-service model instead.

According to Lewis his firm breaks it fee-for-service approach into eight parts:

1. The initial consultation

2. Data collection and entry

3. Creating the advice strategy

4. Preparing the advice

5. Compliance

6. Implementing the advice

7. Confirmation from the client

8. Advice completion.

He said that, typically, the overall advice process included four meetings, with most clients then having an annual performance and strategy review entailing a simplified version of the eight-step process, and the service being priced accordingly.

Lewis said that with a fee-for service model, a firm worked out how long each team member would spend on each part of the process, then multiplied the hours by the team member's charge-out rate with the resultant figure becoming the minimum price the firm needs to be paid to cover costs and turn a profit.

"We tailor our advice to each individual client — we don't follow a ‘one size fits all' approach, so the price of our advice will reflect the client's advice needs," he said.

However, Lewis cautioned that it was necessary to factor in margin for error saying that "no matter how careful you are, when you're building an advice strategy you can come across difficulties, so it's important to allow some extra time to deal with them".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 5 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo