X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Expert Resources
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the Money Management bulletin
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home Expert Analysis

The case for performance fees

JD de Lange writes that high performance fees in themselves aren’t a problem, but that paying high fees for poor performance is.

by Industry Expert
March 8, 2019
in Expert Analysis
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

High fund management fees are always a topic of hot debate, especially in recent years as interest in low-fee, passive funds continues to rise.

The argument is reasonable, but it seems the focus is often too narrowly focused on high fees alone. We believe the issue is a little more complex and it’s not high fees themselves that are the issue, but rather paying high fees for poor performance. And rightly so. Like many things in life paying fees isn’t necessarily a problem, provided you receive good value for money.

X

When structured correctly a performance fee can make sense for the investor in a fund and the manager of that fund. Why? Because it ensures true alignment of interests between the fund manager and the investor. Some would argue this is the only way you can ensure true value because if the manager doesn’t perform they don’t get paid. After all you can get market-like returns for a very small price from a passive index-tracking fund.

In order to work, performance fees need to be properly structured. You don’t want to see performance benchmarks set too low and you certainly don’t want to pay for performance that is simply regaining earlier poor performance. We believe a fair performance fee structure should incorporate a high watermark because this ensures the investor doesn’t have to pay a performance fee until past periods of underperformance have been regained. We feel that reflects real value for money.

But we also believe in choice and it’s why we offer two classes of the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund – Class A units which charge a base fee and a smaller performance fee, and Class B units which charge zero base fee and a higher performance fee.

Class B units mean you can get the index return for free and only pay for outperformance i.e. if the Fund performs in line with the index, the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index, or underperforms, then the fund fee is zero and we pay the running costs. The fees kick in only when the Fund starts to outperform the benchmark and this is then shared with the investor at a ratio of 65 per cent to the investor and 35 per cent to us with the fees calculated on a high watermark basis.

Typically Class B units are an alternative for investors who are sceptical of the ability of active managers to outperform the market over the long-term. If the Fund only tracks, or underperforms the index the investor pays zero fees. If the Fund outperforms the index, the investor is in profit and only then do they give up a portion of the gain as a fee.

Everyone’s perception of value for money is different. We give our clients a choice when investing in our flagship Equity Fund. They can invest in exactly the same Fund, but choose the fee structure that best suits their needs. Whichever fee class they choose, at least they know their interests and those of their manager are aligned.

A poor manager can destroy a lot of wealth and fees are only one part of that. Fees are just the cost of doing business with that manager. They do not indicate value for money in any shape or form.

There’s a lot of debate around this, but we are confident this structure makes us much more aligned with performance and our clients’ interests than merely growing assets.

There’s currently a perception in Australia that low cost or low fees is good in financial services. We think the conversation should be about value for money, not cost. After all you can’t expect the world if you’re not prepared to pay for it. 

It’s not the structure or pricing you offer that matters, but your performance and whether that’s sustainable. In a low interest rate, low-inflation environment, investors and planners are looking for cost-effective ways to access markets and saving on fees is, on face value, an easy way to boost returns.

However, we would argue that investors should be looking at total returns, after fees. Low cost isn’t necessarily better. Surely it is performance that counts.

Because after all the damage of poor performance and unnecessarily high fund manager fees can make a huge difference to one’s retirement savings over the long term.

So what is an investor supposed to do?

Their homework but there is no shortcut.

You can buy the market through an index fund but the only thing you can be sure of is that you will get the return of the market, minus the fee for the passive manager. However, if you buy an active manager, you are buying its people, process and philosophy. The result of these three things working together makes up the product.

Critically they are three features which can be replicated for long-term consistency.  

JD de Lange is chief operating officer of Allan Gray.

Tags: Allan GrayFeesJd De LangePerformance Fees

Related Posts

Shifting views on portfolio construction

by Industry Expert
October 28, 2025

As the industry shifts from client-centric to consumer-centric portfolios, this personalisation is likely to align portfolios with investors’ goals, increasingly...

Foreign currency board

Share-class hedging may not offer best-in-class hedging

by Industry Expert
September 24, 2025

Managing currency risk in an international portfolio can both reduce the volatility, as well as improve overall returns, but needs...

How ETF model portfolios are reshaping practice efficiency

by Industry Expert
September 9, 2025

In today’s evolving financial landscape, advisers are under increasing pressure to deliver more value to clients, to be faster, smarter,...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Consistency is the most underrated investment strategy.

In financial markets, excitement drives headlines. Equity markets rise, fall, and recover — creating stories that capture attention. Yet sustainable...

by Industry Expert
November 5, 2025
Promoted Content

Jonathan Belz – Redefining APAC Access to US Private Assets

Winner of Executive of the Year – Funds Management 2025After years at Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse, Jonathan Belz founded...

by Staff Writer
September 11, 2025
Promoted Content

Real-Time Settlement Efficiency in Modern Crypto Wealth Management

Cryptocurrency liquidity has become a cornerstone of sophisticated wealth management strategies, with real-time settlement capabilities revolutionizing traditional investment approaches. The...

by PartnerArticle
September 4, 2025
Editorial

Relative Return: How fixed income got its defensiveness back

In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Roy Keenan, co-head of fixed income at Yarra Capital...

by Laura Dew
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Podcasts

Relative Return Insider: MYEFO, US data and a 2025 wrap up

December 18, 2025

Relative Return Insider: RBA holds, Fed cuts and Santa’s set to rally

December 11, 2025

Relative Return Insider: GDP rebounds and housing squeeze getting worse

December 5, 2025

Relative Return Insider: US shares rebound, CPI spikes and super investment

November 28, 2025

Relative Return Insider: Economic shifts, political crossroads, and the digital future

November 14, 2025

Relative Return: Helping Australians retire with confidence

November 11, 2025

Top Performing Funds

FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3 y p.a(%)
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
211.38
2
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Fund Hedged
110.90
3
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.11
4
Smarter Money Long-Short Credit Investor USD
67.63
5
BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF
62.68
Money Management provides accurate, informative and insightful editorial coverage of the Australian financial services market, with topics including taxation, managed funds, property investments, shares, risk insurance, master trusts, superannuation, margin lending, financial planning, portfolio construction, and investment strategies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Financial Planning
  • Funds Management
  • Investment Insights
  • ETFs
  • People & Products
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Superannuation

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
    • All News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • All Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • ETFs
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
  • Features
    • All Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
  • Expert Resources
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited