Industry super funds: it's time to end the polemic

commissions industry funds industry super network industry super funds financial planning industry financial services association superannuation funds parliamentary joint committee financial advice financial planning association chairman

30 November 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

It is time for Industry Super Network's David Whiteley to put down the verbal cudgels and for his industry funds’ backers to cease their consequent expenditure of members’ funds.

The executive manager of the Industry Super Network, David Whiteley, is a polemicist.

Whiteley has been the mouthpiece of the industry funds movement in its campaign against the payment of commissions with respect to the provision of financial advice. He must be adjudged as doing his job well.

But one of the necessary skills in conducting a successful polemic is being able to recognise when the argument is won.

That being the case, it is time for Whiteley to put down the verbal cudgels and for his industry funds’ backers to cease their consequent expenditure of members’ funds.

With the Financial Planning Association having moved to phase out commissions, with the Investment and Financial Services Association having cemented its new superannuation charter and with the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (Ripoll inquiry) having delivered its report, it is time to declare a ceasefire.

If Whiteley and his industry fund mentors wanted any proof of the need to accept a truce, they need only have listened to the words of the Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen, and the chairman of the Ripoll inquiry, Bernie Ripoll.

Bowen told the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia conference earlier this month that it was time for superannuation funds to be thinking about the future of the industry rather than trying to gain a competitive advantage over other funds.

Similarly, Ripoll said the quality of financial advice mattered more than how clients paid for it.

The industry funds movement has spent many millions of dollars of its members’ money prosecuting a highly successful campaign. The evidence of that success is manifested in the level of membership growth achieved.

It is unlikely that the industry funds movement or, indeed, the financial planning industry will be pleased with all the recommendations of the Ripoll inquiry. Nonetheless, they should accept the broad outcome and dispense with the battles of the past.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Aware one

It is very worrying that Stephen Jones and the Labor government are now trying to limit the access retirees have to thei...

15 hours ago
Aware one

Let's face it, recruitment numbers are down because the government, and their bureaucrats, have made this a dying indust...

16 hours ago
Fed-up

Phil Anderson is pure gold....

19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND