Super funds ‘inherently conflicted’ says FPA

superannuation FPA advisers retirement

17 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds which offer their own post-retirement products such as the Government’s proposed MyRetirement offering have an inherent conflict of interest with respect to the best interest duty, according to the Financial Planning Association (FPA).

In doing so, the FPA has told the Government it has significant concerns around the Government proposing to have the MyRetirement regime based around the inclusion of safe harbour provisions for product providers.

In a submission to the Treasury dealing with the Development of the Framework for Comprehensive Income Products for Retirement (CIPRS), the FPA said superannuation fund members should be encouraged to consider their retirement goals and needs, and their financial circumstances both inside and outside super, when selecting an appropriate retirement income product, to ensure the product is appropriate and in their best interest.

“Trustees ‘offering’ their own MyRetirement product to individual members have an inherent conflict of interest in this regard,” it said. “A trustee’s fiduciary obligation applies to its members as a whole, including consideration about the sustainability and stability of the fund, which can conflict with what is in the best interest of an individual member.”

“It is extremely concerning that the MyRetirement regime is based around the inclusion of safe harbour provisions for product providers.”

The FPA submission pointed out that the best interest obligations were put in place to shift the emphasis of the motivations in the industry from a sales-based to a consumer-centric approach and culture in order to improve consumer outcomes and increase consumer protections, in response to a number of significant and catastrophic failures.

“The MyRetirement framework now proposes to offer a carve-out from the best interest obligations specifically in relation to the $2.3 trillion of Australian’s retirement savings product providers are responsible for,” the submission said.

“This best interest carve-out, accompanied by the proposal to allow product providers to ‘nudge’ consumers into MyRetirement products, undermines the purpose of the SIS Act and Corporations Act as consumer protection mechanisms.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Simon J

What do you think the motivation is behind this broadly worded legislation Peter? Is it to make it harder for retail ...

1 hour 51 minutes ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

The FSC should have thought about this when they cooperated with O'Dywer/Frydenberg/Hume/FPA/AFA 10 years ago when this...

4 hours ago
Simon J

Sick of it. Canberra is a joke....

5 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND