Super funds want death and TPD tax equivalence
Superannuation funds want death and total and permanent disablement (TPD) insurance within superannuation to carry the same benefits as insurance sold outside of superannuation.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has used a submission to the Parliament Committee Inquiry into the Life Insurance industry to urge equal treatment, claiming the current regulatory settings are "distortive".
It said there were opportunities to reform what represented tax impediment and argued that the Government needed to "consider the distortive effect of the regulatory settings with respect to the taxation of insured benefits inside and outside superannuation".
"While it is more cost efficient to provide death and TPD lump sum insurance through superannuation, the differing tax treatment of benefits paid out can lead to significant differences in the amount of the net benefit received by the member/beneficiaries," the submission said.
It pointed out that part of lump sum TPD benefits (before age 60) and all of death benefits (to non-dependants) paid from superannuation funds were subject to tax at a rate up to 32 per cent, whereas death and TPD insurance payouts made outside superannuation are generally tax free in the hands of the recipient.
"The benefits of insurance in superannuation could be improved by providing tax treatment more equivalent to non-superannuation arrangements," the submission said.
However the submission argued strongly for the benefits of providing insurance within superannuation, pointing out that for most Australians the insurance they have in their superannuation is the only life insurance they hold.
"The provision of group insurance in superannuation is therefore a crucial part of the system supporting Australians who suffer a health-related misfortune," it said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
