That seat in the corporate box may be illegal

15 November 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds which invite employers to sit in corporate boxes during major sporting events may be guilty of providing an illegal inducement, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC's submission to the Productivity Commission (PC) review into alternative default models has pointed out that inducements are not just those capable of being provided by banks but can include corporate hospitality to either employers or employees.

The ASIC submission said section 68A of the Superannuation Industry Supervision (SIS) Act prohibits the trustee of a superannuation fund, or an associate of the trustee, from providing or withholding a good or a service to a person on the condition that one or more of the person's employees becomes a member of the superannuation fund, with some exceptions.

It said the regulator had published guidance for employers "that illegal inducements from superannuation funds may take any form, and include corporate hospitality, holidays, or discounted rates on products or services".

"We have also advised employers to make sure any incentives do not distract them from making an informed decision, and to focus on what's best for their employees," it said.

"However, the real prospect remains of employers selecting a fund as a result of inducement, including lawful inducements and on the basis of competition directed to the employer rather than to the quality of the product for retirement income purposes of the employees."

The ASIC submission also pointed out that there was no limitation on superannuation funds targeting employees with inducements.

It said there was no equivalent of s68A of the SIS Act in relation to employee choice, meaning it was not illegal for a superannuation fund or its associates to give benefits to an employee as an incentive for them to choose their fund.

"ASIC has encouraged fund trustees to be cautious that the use of these incentives does not distract a member from making an informed financial decision about their products and services," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

11 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

11 hours 48 minutes ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

12 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND