Budget super criticism valid, but misdirected

25 July 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Much of the criticism of the Government's Budget changes to superannuation has been driven more by emotion than logic with the media focusing on the wrong victims, according to the director of MGI South Queensland and Executive Chairman of MGI Australasia, Grant Field.

In an analysis of the superannuation changes and their impact on the outcome of the Federal Election, Field said he believed there was a lack of understanding of the Budget super changes and who they were likely to affect.

"None of the proposed changes in super will affect your average Joe, your average parents or grandparents," he said, but conceded that there could be serious consequences for small business owners.

"Considering 99.7 per cent of actively trading businesses in Australia are classified as small to medium enterprises, these changes could affect over two million business owners, so the media hype is warranted, it's just directed at the wrong people," Field said.

He said he was most concerned about the move to limit the maximum deductible super contribution limit to $25,000 — down from $35,000 (for those over 50) and $30,000 (for those under 50).

Field said this was because it appeared to ignore business owners.

"Most business owners that I have worked with over the last 30 years invariably reinvest all their available cash back into growing their business; this is in addition to paying off their home loan and educating their children. For most people, the financial pressure of paying off mortgages and uni fees doesn't ease until well into their forties. Often, business owners don't draw a full salary so don't get the benefit of the 9.5 per cent compulsory superannuation guarantee levy," he said.

Field said it was only by the time business owners reached their 50s that they would be in a financial position to contribute significantly into super and make up for the lack of opportunity in earlier years.

"The budget papers argue that this change will affect only three per cent of super fund members, however, I believe it will impact a significant number of business owners," he said.

"After all, if the government is going to impose a $1.6m cap on the amount that can be concessionally taxed, why does it matter what the contribution limit is?"

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 19 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 20 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND