Super funds ‘inherently conflicted’ says FPA

superannuation/FPA/advisers/retirement/

17 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Superannuation funds which offer their own post-retirement products such as the Government’s proposed MyRetirement offering have an inherent conflict of interest with respect to the best interest duty, according to the Financial Planning Association (FPA).

In doing so, the FPA has told the Government it has significant concerns around the Government proposing to have the MyRetirement regime based around the inclusion of safe harbour provisions for product providers.

In a submission to the Treasury dealing with the Development of the Framework for Comprehensive Income Products for Retirement (CIPRS), the FPA said superannuation fund members should be encouraged to consider their retirement goals and needs, and their financial circumstances both inside and outside super, when selecting an appropriate retirement income product, to ensure the product is appropriate and in their best interest.

“Trustees ‘offering’ their own MyRetirement product to individual members have an inherent conflict of interest in this regard,” it said. “A trustee’s fiduciary obligation applies to its members as a whole, including consideration about the sustainability and stability of the fund, which can conflict with what is in the best interest of an individual member.”

“It is extremely concerning that the MyRetirement regime is based around the inclusion of safe harbour provisions for product providers.”

The FPA submission pointed out that the best interest obligations were put in place to shift the emphasis of the motivations in the industry from a sales-based to a consumer-centric approach and culture in order to improve consumer outcomes and increase consumer protections, in response to a number of significant and catastrophic failures.

“The MyRetirement framework now proposes to offer a carve-out from the best interest obligations specifically in relation to the $2.3 trillion of Australian’s retirement savings product providers are responsible for,” the submission said.

“This best interest carve-out, accompanied by the proposal to allow product providers to ‘nudge’ consumers into MyRetirement products, undermines the purpose of the SIS Act and Corporations Act as consumer protection mechanisms.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 15 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo