Separate super purpose from tax debate - FSC

8 April 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has urged the Government to separate defining the purpose of superannuation from the current tax debate, arguing that super should not be defined by short-term considerations.

The FSC's submission to the Treasury on the objectives of superannuation also makes clear that the objective should be defined in stand-alone legislation and that the relevant minister should be required to issue a "statement of compatibility" when seeking to make legislative changes to the superannuation regime.

However, in arguing that the objective of superannuation should be separated from the current tax debate the FSC appears to have reinforced its view that the Government should not be seeking to use superannuation to fill Budget holes for other short-term purposes.

"The objective of superannuation should have a long-term focus and not be driven by short-term influences, such as the current tax debate," the submission said. "The FSC supports removing this consultation from the distorting effect of the tax debate and ensuring that any definition of the objective has bi-partisan support and is enduring."

It said the FSC also recommended the objective of superannuation is enshrined in stand-alone legislation, rather than in existing superannuation law, "as the former provides a single reference point for relevant future changes to superannuation, tax or social security policy".

It said stand-alone legislation would hard code an agreed definition and place an obligation on the relevant Minister to make a ‘statement of compatibility' with the objective of the system when legislation is introduced that impacts on the superannuation system.

"The Act would not prescribe what information is necessary for a statement of compatibility, but leave this for the Minister to determine," the submission said. "This places the onus on external stakeholders to assess the robustness of a statement of compatibility and publicly hold the Government to account for unpersuasive statements."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

10 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

10 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

11 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND