ISA attacks banks on ‘bundling’

super fund funds management financial planning industry super australia financial services council chief executive FSC

2 March 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The major banks remain guilty of bundling deals to employers capable of influencing them to switch default superannuation products, according to new research released by Industry Super Australia (ISA).

The research, released today, adds new momentum to the ISA's on-going campaign against the banking sector at a time when the Financial Services Council (FSC) is continuing to press for the default funds under modern award regime being opened up to all eligible MySuper products.

The ISA has released research it commissioned by UMR to claim that the business bundling by the major banks represents a real problem and that employees could be "switched into superannuation funds irrespective of the impact on their net returns and long term retirement savings".

The survey of 550 small and medium business revealed 26 per cent of employers surveyed said that a major bank had approached them about transferring their employees' default superannuation to the bank's own retail super fund in the last year and that just under half those approached said their bank offered them benefits to change funds.

The analysis said the most common offers made by the banks involved a direct benefit to the business rather than employees, such as discounts on business banking and insurance products with some employers reporting being offered tickets to sporting events.

The ISA/UMR survey found that 33 per cent of employers offered benefits said they were persuaded to switch to a super fund promoted by their bank, "and many more (57 per cent) report that they are still considering switching".

Commenting on the survey, ISA chief executive, David Whiteley said it gave rise to serious questions about the banks' behaviour.

"It appears they are approaching employers and offering deals to bundle business banking services with employee default superannuation," he said. "This could result in employees' super contributions being paid into bank-owned super funds, which have on average historically produced lower net returns to their members."

"In the best interests' of employees, the law should be changed to prohibit a bank-owned super fund from providing default super services where it is also the provider of business banking services to the employer," Whiteley said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

baffled

I don't have any faith in the regulator. I've stopped reading these and just think some poor guy got busted for a spell...

1 day 5 hours ago
Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

4 days 11 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

4 days 11 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND