Industry funds question SMSF drivers

SMSF smsf trustees AIST government and regulation property financial planning SMSFs self-managed superannuation funds industry super funds superannuation trustees industry super australia advice industry funds australian securities and investments commission

13 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Two bodies representing industry super funds have called for improvement in the quality of advice provided to clients, questioning some of the drivers behind the growth of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) and Industry Super Australia (ISA) have lodged a joint submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Consultation Paper 216, which discusses advice provided to SMSFs, specific disclosure requirements and associated costs.

The two associations expressed support for an enhanced regulatory regime that imposes an obligation on financial planners, accountants and others who provide a "critical entry point on the establishment of SMSFs", which they said would ensure clients made an informed decision.

They pointed to ASIC's review of advice provided to SMSF trustees, which highlighted that only one piece of advice was characterised as good, with close to 30 per cent being deemed poor by the regulator.

"There is a clear need for improvement in the quality of advice provided to clients," the submission said.

"The proposed disclosure requirements in the consultation paper will go a long way to improving the quality of advice."

AIST and ISA also expressed concern about the so-called "push or pull" factors in the establishment of an SMSF and the aggressive marketing of SMSFs as a vehicle for property investment.

The submission stressed it was not only property spruikers who were encouraging clients to invest in property using this method.

"SMSF seminars and wide-scale advertising by service providers are promoting the establishment of SMSFs," the submission said.

"There is to date no adequate published survey of SMSF trustees which analyses the main drivers behind the rapid growth in SMSFs," the two industry bodies added.

"There is a need for work to be undertaken which informs policy makers and regulators and ultimately adds to policy formation which would assist SMSF trustees and those considering the establishment of a self-managed fund."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

David Williams

'Hypersensitised' advice is likely to be successful if based on a more hypersensitive approach to each person. This is ...

17 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

I CAN NOT THINK OF A WORD TO SAY HOW BLOODY STUPID CAN YOU GET JG...

1 day 13 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND