Govt policy could prompt outflows from super

treasury AIST government and regulation chief executive superannuation industry superannuation trustees superannuation funds federal government

8 April 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government's changes to superannuation could result in a significant outflow of funds from the super system as people with high balances seek to avoid the impact, according to a roundtable of top superannuation industry and financial services executives.

The roundtable, conducted immediately after the Treasurer, Wayne Swan and the Minister for Finance, Bill Shorten, announced the changes centred on earnings on assets supporting income streams being tax free up to $100,000, with earnings above $100,000 being taxed at the same concessional rate of 15 per cent in the accumulation phase.

State Super chief executive John Livanas told the roundtable that a genuine risk existed that implementation of the changes would result in significant outflows form superannuation funds.

As well, Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) chief executive Tom Garcia agreed that a risk existed and that if such outflows occurred they could impact fund liquidity.

"The biggest concern is the unintended consequences," Livanas said. "A lot of thinking has to be around the likely reaction. The moment confidence reduces [in the super], the question as to whether to commute pensions come into question."

Energy Industry Super chief executive Alex Hutchison said he believed the changes would genuinely prompt some people with higher superannuation balances to consider options other than super.

"More people will change their affairs to negatively gear and go into property," he said.

Livanas said he believed that when the experience of the superannuation surcharge introduced in 1996 was taken into account, there was a huge risk of outflows.

"It's a huge risk," he said. "You saw what happened in ‘96 with the surcharge. Every time you have tinkering or change [with the system] you open a set of decisions that might not otherwise have been open to consideration."

Deloitte partner Russell Mason said many people would regard the tax as retrospective in view of the fact they had pushed money into superannuation because they had been encouraged by Government to believe it was the right thing to do.

"They did so legitimately. If I was one of those people I would feel aggrieved," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

David Williams

'Hypersensitised' advice is likely to be successful if based on a more hypersensitive approach to each person. This is ...

15 hours 54 minutes ago
JOHN GILLIES

I CAN NOT THINK OF A WORD TO SAY HOW BLOODY STUPID CAN YOU GET JG...

1 day 12 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND