Did the Govt act with stealth on SG amnesty?
The Federal Government surprised virtually the entire superannuation industry with its announcement last month that it was introducing legislation to allow employers an amnesty to make good the underpayment or non-payment of workers’ superannuation guarantee entitlements.
Hearings of the Senate Economics Legislation Committee have revealed that the key superannuation industry and financial services organisations were unaware of the Government’s intentions until the legislation was actually announced.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), the Financial Services Council (FSC) and Industry Super Australia (ISA) all evinced no knowledge of the legislation before its announcement, suggesting no detailed consultation occurred around the measure.
However, both the ASFA and the FSC suggested that the year-long amnesty might actually serve a useful purpose in helping employers, particularly smaller employers, make good their unpaid or underpaid SG obligations.
Asked during hearings of the Senate Economics Legislation Committee whether the FSC’s members had been calling for the amnesty, the organisation’s senior policy manager, Michael Potter, answered “no”.
Similarly, he said that the FSC had not done any work in terms of the amount of SG payments which might be recovered as a result of the amnesty.
Industry Super Australia economist, Matthew Linden also confirmed that his organisation had not been aware of the Government’s intentions on the SG amnesty and told the committee that its introduction would have been news to many people in the industry.
“It is a little bit unusual that we don’t have consultation on an issue such as this,” he said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has called on superannuation funds to improve their oversight of advice fee deductions following an investigation of 10 trustees that found $990 million was charged in one year.
With just 30 per cent of Australians knowing their superannuation balance to the nearest $1,000, Findex has emphasised the role of financial advice in addressing the critical super knowledge gap.
Underestimating the cost of insurance by almost $75,000 in a Statement of Advice is among multiple reasons that a relevant provider has faced action from the FSCP.
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
