Comparing super sectors serves no purpose

superannuation funds SPAA ATO SMSF SMSFs self-managed superannuation funds australian taxation office superannuation industry smsf professionals director cent

16 January 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Australian Taxation Office (ATO) figures on investment performance and fees for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) show it is pointless comparing them with other superannuation sectors, according to the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA).

Director, technical and professional standards at SPAA Graeme Colley said SPAA had always argued such comparisons served no purpose.

"The ATO specifically states that comparing the investment performance between SMSFs and other types of superannuation funds is fraught with danger. While methodologies may be comparable, the data collected from the different types of funds is not the same," he said.

"It's similar with fees. Comparing the operating expenses of SMSFs with other types of superannuation funds is difficult. While the ratios used in the ATO statistics may be comparable, the data collected from the different types of funds is not the same."

Colley argues that SMSFs are tightly regulated and the regulator scrutinises them closely since they are managed by individuals, whereas other funds have prudential systems in place.

Comparisons of SMSFs with other sectors is not a like-with-like comparison, he said.

SPAA recently said super funds should be guarded on their commentary on SMSFs after Media Super was fined $10,200 for misleading advertising using such a comparison.

He said people should get objective and impartial advice from experts on the superannuation industry.

The expense ratios of SMSFs are about 0.56 per cent in the 12 months to 30 June 2012, falling from 0.69 per cent to 0.56 per cent over the five years to 2012.

"This decrease reflects the increase in the asset sizes of SMSFs over the period as well as increased competition in the market for audit, accounting and administration services for SMSFs. Average operating expenses have increased over the same period and are estimated to be $5600.

"Due to the fixed costs of operating a fund, SMSFs with lower balances have higher average expense ratios — 9.5 per cent with SMSFs with a balance of $50,000 compared to less than 1 per cent for SMSFs with assets of more than $500,000."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

14 hours 49 minutes ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

18 hours ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

2 days 10 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND