ASIC identifies more super fund failures

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has confirmed that a number of superannuation funds have been falling short on their obligations to provide transparent information around product disclosure statements (PDS) and how much they are actually paying their trustees.

ASIC said it had intervened in relation to 21 superannuation funds, representing 15 per cent of the so-called “trustee population” with respect to failings under the Transparency Information (TI) elements of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 requiring funds to disclose information on a website and keep it up to date at all times.

ASIC did not reveal whether the funds were industry funds, retail funds or small Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated funds, however it represents the second significant regulatory fail by superannuation funds with the regulator last Friday detailing the findings of its member experience in superannuation project entailing a harsh overall judgement, referring specifically to “a lack of adequate upfront and ongoing disclosure to members about insurance coverage” and “the use of inappropriate defaults when transferring members between different divisions of funds”.

Related News:

In its most recent report, the regulator said that 21 super fund websites had been identified as failing to meet TI requirements, and that two of those funds had assets exceeding $10 billion.

The transparency deficiencies identified in ASIC's review comprised:

  • No super fund website (10 funds);
  • No TI on the fund website (four funds);
  • No remuneration information (five funds); and
  • Remuneration disclosed in bands, rather than for each individual executive officer (two funds).

ASIC’s actions saw seven superannuation funds wound up after their members had been transferred to another fund.

According to the ASIC analysis, seven trustees disclosed the required information, five made it easier to find the information, and trustees of two small funds, who did not have websitesm, sought relief from the TI obligations.

Commenting on the enforcement action, ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell said the economic significance of superannuation meant that information about the superannuation industry should be transparent, both for fund members and gatekeepers such as analysts, advisers and journalists.

“ASIC's expectation is that super fund websites should be easily found by searching on the fund's name using an Internet search engine and that the website homepage should prominently point to the Transparency Information,” Kell said.

Related Content

Advisers must articulate value under LIF

Risk advisers must articulate the value of their advice as a separate entity from the value of insurance premiums in light of new commission structure...more

Medcraft urged Morrison to extend BEAR to insurance

The now-retired chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Greg Medcraft, urged the Treasurer, Scott Morrison to extend ...more

‘Lapse’ and ‘churn’ are not the issue

The words lapse and churn in life insurance policies are not the issue but rather whether the advice given was in the client’s best interest and com...more




It 's union funds. If it was retail ASIC would be more than happy to disclose who it was and drag and quarter them. They have to protect the union funds as bad news here does not suit the vendetta they have against retail funds and financial planners.

"ASIC did not reveal whether the funds were industry funds, retail funds or small Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated funds"

If you have inside information pray do tell and back up your allegation.

Seems you have forgotten the often reported failures, misdeeds, criminal actions of some retail funds and some financial advisers - often reported here frequently.

An open mind gives better advice and makes a better advisor.

Add new comment