APRA at odds with Coalition on independent directors
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has signaled an important difference in view on superannuation fund governance to that expressed by the Federal Opposition and the Financial Services Council.
The regulator has declared it does not believe independent directors on superannuation funds need to be treated the same as those on publicly-listed financial services companies such as banks and insurance companies.
APRA deputy chairman Ross Jones told the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds in Brisbane that independent directors on superannuation funds were not the same as those on banks and insurance products - and that the regulator would be treating them accordingly.
On the broader question of prudential standards and governance, Jones said that APRA's focus would be on board behaviours rather than structures.
He claimed the regulatory approach allowed APRA a measure of flexibility in looking at and dealing with super board behaviours.
"We don't care how you achieve the objectives so long as you know what the objectives are," he said.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
ASIC has called on superannuation funds to improve their oversight of advice fee deductions following an investigation of 10 trustees that found $990 million was charged in one year.
With just 30 per cent of Australians knowing their superannuation balance to the nearest $1,000, Findex has emphasised the role of financial advice in addressing the critical super knowledge gap.
Underestimating the cost of insurance by almost $75,000 in a Statement of Advice is among multiple reasons that a relevant provider has faced action from the FSCP.
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
