Timeshare company sued for best interest failure

karen chester ASIC timeshare Ultiqa

3 November 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

Timeshare company Ultiqa Lifestyle Promotions is being sued for failing to ensure financial advice was in best interests of customers by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC had commenced civil penalty proceedings against Ultiqa regarding advice provided by financial advisers who were authorised representatives (ARs) of Ultiqa from October 2017 to March 2019.

ASIC’s case stated Ultiqa’s ARs did not act in their clients' best interests and did not give appropriate advice based on clients’ circumstances.

The corporate regulator claimed that some consumers had not sought advice regarding a timeshare scheme and some were unaware they were receiving financial advice.

During ASIC’s investigation, consumers reported to ASIC that upfront costs of joining the timeshare scheme were approximately $10,000 to $25,000, with ongoing fees of up to $800 per year.

Some consumers complained to ASIC they had difficulty booking holidays due to lack of availability.

ASIC further alleged that Ultiqa did not provide relevant training to its AR, monitor and supervise its ARs appropriately; and have documented policies and procedures in place to support the advice process.

ASIC also alleged Ultiqa’s conduct amounted to a breach of its obligations as an Australian financial services (AFS) licensee to act efficiently, honestly and fairly.

Ultiqa ceased selling interests in the Scheme on 28 January, 2020, and was placed into members' voluntary liquidation on 30 April, 2021.

The scheme remained active, as did the balance of the Ultiqa Group entities and the firm currently held an AFS licence.

ASIC was seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and other orders to be made by the Court and the date for the first case management hearing was yet to be scheduled.

Karen Chester, ASIC deputy chair, said timeshare schemes were complex financial products which could be difficult to understand and involved long-term financial commitments.

“Consumer harm can and has resulted when consumers are not aware of the up-front costs, ongoing fees or the nature of their investment – like how easy (or not) it is to exit,” Chester said.

“This is the first time ASIC has taken action against a timeshare provider in relation to financial product advice practices.

“The timeshare industry is on notice to ensure existing compliance and advice practices comply at all times with the obligations on all financial advisers, especially for that advice to be in the consumers’ best interests.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

baffled

I don't have any faith in the regulator. I've stopped reading these and just think some poor guy got busted for a spell...

1 hour 26 minutes ago
Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

3 days 6 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

3 days 6 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND