Put AFCA on ice until after Royal Commission says CIO

AFCA Royal Commission CIO

4 December 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Government has been urged to place the establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) on hold because of the implications which might flow from the Royal Commission into the Banking and Financial Services industry.

Credit and Investments Obudsman, Raj Venga said the announcement of the Royal Commission represented an implicit acknowledgement that the AFCA was not fit for purpose because it could not address past, or prevent, future financial scandals.

He said that despite this, the Prime Minister was maintaining that the Royal Commission should not defer or limit any legislation that has already been proposed for the sector, including the AFCA Bill.

“Given the Royal Commission’s terms of reference expressly refer to ‘the effectiveness of mechanisms for redress for consumers of financial services’, it is not clear at all why AFCA should not be shelved until the findings of the Royal Commission are known,” Venga said. “AFCA is, after all, a mere rebranding of the existing dispute resolution bodies (CIO, Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal(SCT)), with a few bells and whistles attached.” 

“It would be entirely irresponsible and reckless for the Government to establish AFCA without taking into account the findings and recommendations of the Royal Commission. These are likely to suggest what powers, jurisdiction, governance and funding a dispute resolution body needs to provide effective consumer redress in the wake of financial scandals,” he said. “‘AFCA will also be a very disruptive upheaval for consumers and small businesses, and won’t deliver benefits in the short-term. In all likelihood, the Royal Commission will find that AFCA will need to be unwound or otherwise significantly reshaped.”  

“CIO, FOS and the SCT collectively have about 500 staff who service 48,000 consumers and 39,000 financial providers per year,” Vegan said.

“The overwhelming number of complainants are Mum and Dad consumers and the vast majority of financial providers are sole traders or small businesses. Every one of these will be significantly impacted by the introduction of AFCA. And for no good reason,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

12 hours 43 minutes ago
So happy to hear this

It couldn't happen to a more worthy organisation - good luck to the heroes coming to clean the place up!...

13 hours 27 minutes ago
Toni Watson

Yes used the money that should have been invested as if it was his own. Thought he was invincible but the house of cards...

13 hours 59 minutes ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND