ASIC may have to consider competition

productivity commission ASIC ACCC regulation turnbull government competition Kelly O'Dwyer

29 March 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

In the midst of a Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into competition in the financial services industry, the Government has proposed requiring the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to consider the effects on competition when exercising its powers.

The Turnbull Government yesterday introduced a bill to Parliament that would amend the ASIC Act 2001 to provide that “ASIC must consider the effects that the performance of its functions and the exercise of its powers will have on competition in the financial system”.

The proposed change stems from the Financial System Inquiry of 2015, which recommended that the Government include consideration of competition in ASIC’s mandate. There is no current equivalent in the law directing the regulator’s actions.

In the explanatory memorandum accompanying the bill, the Government said that ASIC was already implicitly required to consider competition, as it is “important to improving the performance of the financial system and will impact on the efficiency and development of the economy”.

The memorandum, circulated by the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer, suggested that specific legislation requiring such considerations would be more reliable though.

“An explicit reference to take competition issues into account would oblige ASIC to consciously consider how its actions may impact on competition in the financial system and will enable ASIC to favour one option over another due to its effects on competition,” she said.

The proposed legislation would also enable the appointment of a second ASIC deputy chair and allow the regulator to employ staff outside of the Public Service Act 1999.

It also specified that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) would remain as the competition regulator across the economy, as “the measure [was] not intended to limit or expand the scope of ASIC’s regulatory responsibilities”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

1 day 4 hours ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

1 day 7 hours ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

3 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND