APRA foreshadows getting ‘constructively tough’

australian prudential regulation authority APRA australian securities and investments commission ASIC Bank Executive Accountability Regime john lonsdale superannuation funds super funds enforcement approach policy licence conditions enforceable undertakings EU

3 September 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has taken a leaf out of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) play book and has signalled its greater use of publicly naming institutions and superannuation funds against which it takes action.

The regulator’s approach has been outlined in its latest Enforcement Approach policy within which has said it will consider how it publicises its enforcement actions on a case by case basis but has made clear it will typically move to make such actions public.

“APRA will consider when and how to publicise the enforcement actions it takes on a case by case basis. However, unless there are likely to be risks to beneficiaries’ interests and / or financial stability from publicising an action, APRA will typically make public:

• administrative enforcement actions taken by APRA, such as formal directions and licence conditions or infringement notices;

• acceptance of an enforceable undertaking received from a regulated entity or an individual;

• disqualifications of accountable persons under the Bank Executive Accountability Regime, or other responsible persons under the prudential framework; and

• court-based enforcement actions commenced by APRA.

Announcing the new enforcement approach, APRA deputy chair, John Lonsdale described it as a “constructively tough” enforcement appetite indicative of a willingness by APRA to use its powers “more assertively to hold regulated entities and their leaders to account”.

“Getting ‘constructively tough’ is not only about taking stronger action earlier where banks, insurers and super licensees break the law, or fail to behave in an open and cooperative manner with us. It also means setting public examples where it is appropriate to do so and there’s no risk to financial stability,” he said.

“Publicising our enforcement actions not only acts as a general deterrent, it gives the community confidence that financial institutions are being held to account when they do the wrong thing,” Lonsdale said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

14 hours ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

17 hours ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

2 days 9 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND