AIOFP questions decision to exclude banks from CSLR

AIOFP CSLR Jane Hume Josh Frydenberg peter johnston

4 November 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Independent Financial Professionals (AIOFP) has written to Parliament questioning whether the minister of financial services and the Treasurer’s pre-politics careers influenced the decision to exclude the banks from the compensation scheme of last resort (CSLR).

Peter Johnston, AIOFP executive director, said Senator Jane Hume and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg both had strong ties to the banking sector.

“Considering the Minister and Treasurer’s pre-political career was with the banking sector, this does not pass the pub test,” Johnston said.

“It seems the Minister has forgotten that consumers allowed her into parliament to act in their best interests not the banks.”

Johnston said the decision for Hume, the minister for financial services, superannuation and digital economy, to defy the Royal Commission recommendations was odd.

“Considering losses from managed investment schemes associated with banks and other institutions is the greatest negative issue for consumers over the decades and 98.5% of all complaints lodged with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) are about poor treatment by banks and other institutions in 2020/21, why would the Minister want them excluded?” Johnston said.

“In addition, the CSLR start date of 2009 is to help consumers defrauded by a poorly managed investment scheme, why does the Minister not want to help them? Surely the best interests of consumers comes first?”

Johnson said this was why a Federal Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to investigate whether questionable behaviour that was not in the best interests of consumers was needed.

“The track record of a number of Coalition Politicians in recent times is not a good look,” Johnson said.

“Christian Porter’s Blind Trust, Bridget McKenzie’s Sports grants, Susan Leys travel expenses and Stuart Robert’s dealings with a Chinese billionaire are all decisions that deserve further scrutiny.    

“The advice community finds it quite ironic that this Government imposes an ethics regime on our industry and the Prime Minister chooses not to impose one on his own team.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

1 day 16 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

1 day 16 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 11 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND