Objective of super a web of complexity

20 February 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The enshrinement of the objective of superannuation is riddled with complexity and questions must be asked as to whether it could be simplified to reduce the burden on the industry, according to an academic.

University of Melbourne research director and professor of finance, Professor Kevin Davis, said there had been excessive debate over the specificities of the objective but it should kept simple.

Speaking during a panel discussion at the 2017 SMSF Association Conference in Melbourne last week, Davis said policymakers should view superannuation as part of the overall retirement policy and should form the objective in this context. "For example is the pension a right or is it a safety net? The trouble is a lot of this is about dealing with the complexities of the system. And the question you have to ask is does it have to be complex?" Davis asked.

"Do we have a system where we've built in so many tax concessions and various types of retirement [products] that we're wasting a lot of services on people dealing with those complexities. Can we make it simpler?" SMSF Association head of policy, Jordan George, said there was no reference to either adequacy or what the association called security provided in retirement to ensure self-sufficiency and a comfortable standard of living in retirement.

"The current wording is quite open to interpretation to a future minister that any support above the age pension income level is too much in terms of the tax concession level," George said.

"Our view has been that the idea of having a sub objective of the system providing a dignified and secure retirement would allow future policymakers to be directed that tax concessions are appropriate for encouraging people to save for a level above the Age Pension." George also said there was no definitive idea of what 'adequate' meant, there was a lack of consensus on whether policymakers would use replacement rates or targeted levels of income. While the government has decided that super should provide people with adequate levels of retirement income, this may not be the case in other funding areas such as Age Pension, Newstart and disability funding. Davis said the objective should focus on a social policy that included the notion of people having a dignified, adequate retirement along with adequate health care and aged care requirements such as accommodation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

14 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

15 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND