Should life insurers be allowed to unilaterally amend policies?
Life insurance companies should have the right to unilaterally amend policy terms if it will benefit a majority of consumers, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).
Answering questions on notice for the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, the FSC said it was recommending that the Insurance Contracts Act be amended to allow life insurance companies to “unilaterally amend policy terms where the overall benefits enjoyed by cohorts of consumers are greater than those that the consumer currently enjoys”.
Furthermore, the FSC said it saw a role for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in overseeing such a practice.
“We would like to see ASIC play an important role in this process to ensure that, on balance, customers are better off as a result of the rationalisation,” it said.
“This would be a requirement that the provider initially conducts the assessment with oversight from ASIC,” the FSC said.
The answer said that if a reinsurer was involved, independent actuarial advice would be required prior to the action that confirmed reinsurers were not materially impacted by product rationalisation and if so, they would provide consent to the change.
Recommended for you
Policy and advocacy specialist Benjamin Marshan has left the Council of Australian Life Insurers after less than a year, having joined in March from the Financial Planning Association of Australia.
The declining volume of risk advisers meant KPMG has found a rising lapse rate for insurance policies arranged by independent financial advisers, particularly in the TPD and death cover space.
The Life Insurance Code of Practice has transferred from the Financial Services Council to the Council of Australian Life Insurers.
The firm has announced it will no longer be writing new life insurance policies in the retail advised and corporate group insurance channels, citing a declining market and risk adviser numbers.
