Lawyers point finger at insurers on TPD

CFP compliance financial planning TPD

18 August 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Insurance companies and the manner in which some of them put super fund members through "the wringer" are more responsible for the problems impacting Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance products than the involvement of lawyers.

That is the assessment of a principal of leading plaintiff law firm, Maurice Blackburn, Peter Koutsoukis who has written a column for Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, defending the role of lawyers in the group insurance space and denying suggestions that high levels of lawyer activity had undermined the viability of the TPD insurance regime.

Instead, Koutsoukis points to the claims handling processes of the major insurers, particularly those servicing retail funds, to suggest that superannuation fund members who seek to make claims are being put through the "wringer".

"Obviously not all group insurers are the same, and not every claimant is put through the wringer, but there are at least a dozen insurers, in particular retail funds, whose conduct is well short of reasonable when processing claims," Koutsoukis writes.

His comments have come little more than a week out from a Super Review breakfast which will openly question what has gone wrong with the TPD regime and the role of lawyers.

"Industry leaders have recently been complaining about the claims process being disrupted and made more complicated by the actions of lawyers. I wholeheartedly reject this argument," Koutsoukis wrote. One only needs to look at what the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) has been saying about the industry to see that it needs to get its own house in order before pointing the finger at advocates who provide legal help to injured and sick people struggling to deal with a complex claims process and hostile insurance industry."

Koutsoukis has suggested in his column that a code of conduct for claims management, similar to that used in other areas of insurance would be a good start towards addressing the problems of the group life/risk sector.

"Law firms who work in superannuation are keen to discuss a Code of Conduct with super funds and insurers to improve [the] conduct of all industry participants," he wrote

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

6 hours ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

1 day 22 hours ago
Gee

Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...

2 days 20 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND