Why investors should ignore ‘hysterical’ China regulatory fears

China Platinum munro Magellan

10 September 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The fears of Chinese regulatory activity are ‘hysterical’ and could actually present a buying opportunity for investors seeking exposure to China.

Writing in its monthly update, both the Platinum Asia and Platinum International funds highlighted the regulation could not be compared to Western markets and was less problematic than people feared.

Among regulations proposed were limits to time teenagers could spend playing video games, tighter restrictions on its digital economy, scrutiny of private tutoring businesses, regulation of online insurance companies and anti-monopoly investigations.

Platinum Asia fund managers, Cameron Robertson and Andrew Clifford, said: “Recent coverage of policy reforms in China has bordered on hysterical at times. This is unhelpful for investors. China has a very different form of Government which many in the West see as ‘undemocratic’.

“We would gently remind those commentators that this is not unusual in Asia and not at all equivalent to poor social or economic outcomes – see for example Singapore, and to a lesser extent South Korea and Japan.

“One simply cannot expect the same regulation and culture of corporate governance to apply globally. China has a different system to the anglophone West – this should hardly be a shock to seasoned investors. Moreover, it is the second-largest equity market in the world and among its cheapest.”

The Platinum Asia fund had a 44.3% weighting to China including stocks such as Tencent and Alibaba, at 3.5% and 3.6% respectively, which were likely to be affected by the increased regulation.

“Regulations limiting property speculation, tech market abuses and time spent gaming are far from senseless nor incompatible with the functioning of markets, in our view,” Platinum said.

Meanwhile, the global Platinum International fund had 19.8% allocated to China including three of its top 10 largest holdings with its largest holding being ZTO Express Cayman at 3.1%.

It acknowledged it had experienced “near-term, mark-to-market losses on Chinese stocks” during August over the regulatory fears but said that it considered it to be a buying opportunity as it considered the regulation was “ongoing and considered”.

This was in contrary to Munro Partners and Magellan Financial Group who had both either exited or significantly reduced their Chinese holdings.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

1 day 9 hours ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

1 day 12 hours ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

3 days 5 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND