Which market performed best in Q3?
The ASX 200 was the only major market to report positive gains during the third quarter of 2021/22.
Looking at data from FE Analytics, over the three months to 31 March, the ASX 200 returned 2.2% compared to losses by global markets.
It was a case of large-cap stocks being the best performers over the period with the ASX 50 returning 4% and the All Ordinaries returning 1.6% compared to losses of 4.2% by the ASX Small Ordinaries.
Performance of ASX indices during Q3
The ASX 50 included commodity stocks like Woodside Petroleum which was up 54%, BHP up 30%, South32 up 28% and Santos which was up 24.7%.
Dale Gillham, chief analyst at Wealth Within, said: “I do believe this trend will continue, therefore, I would advise investors to stick to the top 50 stocks in the Australian market if they want to achieve some good profits”.
Looking at global markets, the worst-performing major market was the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite which had lost 13% followed by Japan’s TOPIX and Hong Kong Hang Seng index which both lost more than 9%.
In the US, the Dow Jones had lost 5.2%, the S&P 500 had lost 7.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq had lost 10.6% as technology stocks because of the long duration of their earnings in an environment with rising inflation and interest rates.
The FTSE 100 lost 2.5% and the MSCI World index lost 7%.
Performance of developed markets during Q3
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
GQG Partners has completed the acquisition of the minority interests held by Pacific Current Group in three affiliates which will form its new Private Capital Solutions division.
The wealth management firm has unveiled a new fund in partnership with investment specialist Partners Group, describing the investment solution as an “alternative” to traditional alternatives.
Fidante affiliate NovaPort Capital has announced the closure of its small cap and microcap funds, citing expected declining flows.
T. Rowe Price believes Australian growth is successfully managing to shrug off consumer weakness, but the firm’s multi-asset team is not yet positive enough to increase its underweight position.
