Too many managers spoil the returns: van Eyk
Too many active managers can dilute the benefits of risk through over-diversification, according to van Eyk chief executive Mark Thomas.
Thomas said van Eyk research showed active managers bet mostly on movements in the market, and although investors paid higher fees for managed funds, portfolios often held little stock-specific or active risk.
Combining active managers in a portfolio can water down that small amount of risk even further, according to van Eyk.
From three randomly selected active fund managers in a single portfolio, only two stockholdings varied more than 2 per cent from the benchmark while the rest were less than 2 per cent of their market weight, according to the research.
"You need to dig down deep into the detail when mixing these sorts of investments in order to get the degree of risk you intended," Thomas said.
Thomas said it was the right time for investors to be taking on more risk due to relatively attractive share valuations, and ongoing market volatility driven by the euro crisis and other economic strains that give active managers the opportunity to exploit market mispricing.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
T. Rowe Price believes Australian growth is successfully managing to shrug off consumer weakness, but the firm’s multi-asset team is not yet positive enough to increase its underweight position.
Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made by an alleged threat actor, following a cyber incident last weekend.
The latest budget papers have outlined a $10 million provision for ASIC greenwashing enforcement activity as well as funds for a sustainable labelling regime to be partially met by industry levies.
Betashares has expanded its fixed income solutions with the launch of a new ETF offering exposure to subordinated bonds issued by the big four Australian banks.
