Popular analysis might lead to allocation mistakes
Popular factor analysis tools might lead investors to dangerous allocation mistakes, according to smart beta index provider, ERI Scientific Beta.
Its newest study, “Measuring Factor Exposure Better to Manage Factor Allocation Better: A Critical Approach to Popular Box Initiatives”, found there were several new factor tools promoted by investment market leaders as factor risk analysis standards.
However, most of them could lead to serious misalignment between an investor’s factor diversification objectives and the measured and realised allocation.
The findings of the study indicated that:
- These analytic tools did not employ academically-grounded factors and their factor-finding process maximised the risk of ending up with false factors,
- Non-standard factors led to mismeasurement of exposures and may capture exposure to redundant factors,
- The use of factor scores instead of factor betas for the measurement factor exposures was a cause of concern,
- The major drawback factor scores suffered from “double counting” of exposures, which was due to their lack of regard for the correlation structure of factors.
Recommended for you
Self-reporting issues to ASIC could lead to a reduced charge for a fund manager but it may not exempt them from enforcement action altogether, according to ASIC chair Joe Longo.
AllianceBernstein has announced its chief investment officer and Australian equity manager Roy Maslen is to step down from the firm at the end of the year.
Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it plans to launch a new affiliate from a global equities team departing Royal London Asset Management.
Asset manager Nuveen is seeing opportunity in municipal bonds which are at their highest yields in over a decade.