ETF industry loses $5b in January after market volatility
The Australian exchange traded fund (ETF) industry has started 2022 negatively with losses of $5 billion during January.
According to the monthly report from BetaShares, January saw assets under management fell 3.7%, some $5.1 billion during January.
This was despite inflows of $1.5 billion during the month to end with $131.8 billion.
“With global and Australian sharemarkets falling steeply in the first month of 2022, positive inflows were not enough to combat a drop in asset values, which led to a negative start for the Australian ETF industry,” it said.
The industry ended 2021 at an all-time high of $136.9 billion, growing 44% during the year.
In light of the volatility, monthly trading values increased by 26% to reach its second-highest monthly level on record of $10.3 billion. BetaShares said this had been a growing trend during market volatility as investors took advantage of the liquidity offered by ETFs to express market views.
The majority of inflows went into international equities, which gained $641 million, followed by Australian equities which increased by $410 million.
There were also large inflows into defensive ETFs such as iShares Enhanced Cash ETF, BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF and iShares Government Inflation ETF which gained $107 million, $100 million and $56 million respectively. As a sector, cash ETFs saw inflows of $207 million.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
GQG Partners has completed the acquisition of the minority interests held by Pacific Current Group in three affiliates which will form its new Private Capital Solutions division.
The wealth management firm has unveiled a new fund in partnership with PG3 AG and investment specialist Longreach Alternatives, describing the investment solution as an “alternative” to traditional alternatives.
Fidante affiliate NovaPort Capital has announced the closure of its small cap and microcap funds, citing expected declining flows.
T. Rowe Price believes Australian growth is successfully managing to shrug off consumer weakness, but the firm’s multi-asset team is not yet positive enough to increase its underweight position.
