Timeshare industry is on notice: CHOICE
Consumer group CHOICE has welcomed the Federal Court’s decision against timeshare provider Ultiqa for multiple breaches of financial services laws, including breaching the best interests duty, stating the industry is now on notice.
Timeshare salespeople were subject to financial advice laws meaning advisers selling timeshares needed to give advice that was in the best interest of their customers.
The court found that between October 2017 and March 2019, financial advisers acting as authorised representatives of Ultiqa advised consumers to invest in the Ultiqa Lifestyle Scheme timeshare despite such advice not being in the consumers’ best interests and being inappropriate to their circumstances.
Consumers reported the upfront cost of joining the scheme was between $10,000 to $25,000 with ongoing annual fees of up to $800. Most consumers who bought into the timeshare scheme took out a loan with a company related to Ultiqa to pay for their timeshare interest.
The court was told Ultiqa representatives pressured consumers, prevented them from obtaining external advice, misled consumers and offered inducements for them to sign up. A sales manual stated: “Do everything you can do to amuse, interest, excite, relax, humour, flatter and if necessary cajole your clients into staying”.
This was the first case of this kind brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
CHOICE chief executive, Alan Kirkland, said: “These sorts of practices are rife across the timeshare industry, so this decision sends a huge warning to other timeshare salespeople and operators.
“The timeshare industry is now on notice. Its sales practices and contract terms need to change - otherwise operators should expect more court action.”
The court action followed a CHOICE complaint to the ASIC about Ultiqa back in 2017, which included evidence of a couple pressured into purchasing a timeshare contract with finance that could last until 2081, despite telling the operator they were “financially stretched”.
ASIC deputy chair, Karen Chester, said: “This is an important decision for consumers and ASIC’s first financial advice action against a timeshare provider. Timeshare schemes are complex financial products. They can be difficult to understand and compare. They involve significant long term financial commitments of tens of thousands of dollars, are often loan-financed, and can be difficult to exit.
“When sold alongside financial advice, it is fundamental – and legally required – that the advice is in the consumer’s best interest and appropriate to their circumstances.”
Recommended for you
The Financial Advice Association Australia has released its pre-budget submission, including six key items to help reduce the cost of professional advice and increase its accessibility.
Phil Anderson, general manager for financial advice at the FAAA, believes the CSLR levy could reach $100 million if Dixon Advisory complaints are allowed to continue.
Proposed legislative changes to safe harbour duty could result in advisers having reduced professional indemnity costs, a joint submission by seven major licensees said.
With 66 per cent of newly established advice licensees being sole advisers, what are the risks and legal ramifications to consider when taking the plunge into self-licensing?
