Tax-style “high audit” system proposed for advice space
Financial advisers’ high regulatory burden is the product of a system that wrongly fails to distinguish “high risk” and “low risk” advice, an adviser believes.
Just as the tax system delineates higher risk players with a “high audit” status, so too should financial advice regulators, according to MEDIQ Financial managing director and AFA Rising Star Ravi Agarwal.
“The people who are providing advice 'low audit’ advice, things like making sure they have the right superannuation and insurances and they have a plan and are working towards financial goals shouldn’t have the onus placed on them to prove that they are not double gearing into a property fund,” he told Money Management.
Agarwal believes the failure to separate riskier financial activities from those offered by everyday advisers is damaging client/adviser relationships and the profession’s perception among the wider community.
He said anything involving complex exposure that is difficult to articulate to the client, such as derivatives, should be subject to rigorous regulatory guidelines, but retail advice should be subject to less scrutiny.
Recommended for you
The FAAA is set to launch an initiative next week to boost adviser numbers, offering support for Professional Year candidates and their supervisors.
Advice licensee Centrepoint Alliance could be more open to a proportional takeover bid after shareholders rejected a special resolution around takeover provisions.
Global private markets firm Partners Group has appointed a client solutions manager to strengthen its service offering across Australia’s southern states.
An aging profession and impending adviser exodus are fuelling a shift in the advice practice landscape, according to Adviser Ratings’ latest report, while internal restructuring prompts adviser redistribution.
