TAA warns of ‘back to the future’ return to vertical integration

AIST TAA qoa best interest duty

19 April 2023
| By Rhea Nath |
image
image
expand image

Without putting guardrails in place for non-relevant providers providing advice, Australia runs the risk of a “back to the future” scenario that did not previously serve it well, according to The Advisers Association (TAA).

The TAA backed some of the Quality of Advice Review recommendations but believed great care needed to be taken in its implementation to avoid a return to vertical integration.

In particular, there should be guardrails around who should be permitted to deliver personal financial advice, the extent of the advice they give, the minimum education and qualifications they hold and the obligation to provide “good advice”, TAA said.

“It is very clear, particularly as a large percentage of the population nears retirement, that we need to enable more people to give personal financial advice,” said Neil Macdonald, TAA chief executive.

“But while the advice profession continues to debate what the future should look like, industry funds have continued giving advice and are taking over the role previously played by the banks.”

However, the low production of Statements of Advice (SOAs) led TAA to believe general advice was being provided where personal advice was likely required, especially in preparation for retirement.

Macdonald said: “There is a world of difference between giving people general information and giving them personal financial advice that meets their needs.

“There is also a risk that general advice will continue to be provided instead of ‘good’ personal advice, and that doesn’t address the issues of the past.”

As recently pointed out by the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), the review’s recommendation on expanding the definition of personal advice to require non-relevant providers to provide good advice was an important consumer protection method if the existing safe harbour provisions were to be removed. 

“If it is not, then complex retirement advice could easily be provided to members of a super fund, without any consideration of issues that profoundly impact consumers in retirement — for example, Centrelink benefits, who and when to move to pension phase, etc,” Macdonald observed. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

29 minutes ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

5 hours ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

2 days 23 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND