Survey respondents demand simplification of super
By Mike Taylor
THE Federal Government should use its majority in both houses of Parliament to substantially simplify Australia’s superannuation laws.
That is the bottom line of an exclusive survey conducted by Money Management’s sister publication SuperReview earlier this month, with 93.3 per cent of more than 230 respondents making it clear that the existing regulatory environment is too complex and is acting as an impediment to increasing retirement savings for Australians.
What should be most disturbing to the Government, however, is the fact that the survey was directly targeted at superannuation practitioners, but 76.4 per cent of those people said they did not fully understand Australia’s superannuation laws.
In fact, asked to grade the level of their understanding, only 14.4 per cent of respondents claimed to have an excellent understanding, while 44.4 per cent said they had a good understanding.
On the negative side of the equation, 4.2 per cent of respondents said they did not understand the superannuation laws, while 37 per cent acknowledged they had only a fair understanding.
The survey found that an overwhelming number of respondents (94.6 per cent) believed the existing laws and regulations were simply too complex, with 86.1 per cent believing this complexity was acting to discourage superannuation savings.
Recommended for you
The popularity of ETFs, which are approaching $200 billion in Australia, is a potential threat to the advice landscape if consumers opt to invest directly, according to this senior partner.
A former AMP financial adviser has urged advisers in the BOLR class action against AMP to object to the “unfair and unreasonable” $100 million settlement sum as the objection deadline approaches on 22 May.
Two Victoria-based financial advice practices have merged and rebranded as Forbes Fava Saville Financial Planning, as the firm realises the benefits of added scale.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made its latest ruling over a case involving an incorrect Statement of Advice.