Sanctions challenge for financial services
Australian financial institutions need to become more risk aware with respect to the enforcement of global sanctions, according to new research released this week by Deloitte.
The Deloitte study, Facing the Sanctions Challenge in Financial Services, claims that while financial services companies recognise that sanctions compliance is a matter of concern, only half have turned their sanctions policies into a process.
According to the lead partner of Deloitte’s Asia Pacific Sanctions Advisory Practice, Graham Dillon, this creates the real possibility of regulatory discipline by authorities.
“The absence of a robust sanctions compliance program, or an inadequate one, poses a real risk of prosecution from either Australian or international authorities, in particular the US Office of Foreign Assets Control,” he said.
Dillon warned that the increasing burden of regulatory oversight was occurring at a time when financial institutions were having to contend with shrinking compliance budgets and headcounts.
He described the scenario as “a combination fraught with danger”.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Proposed legislative changes to safe harbour duty could result in advisers having reduced professional indemnity costs, a joint submission by seven major licensees said.
With 66 per cent of newly established advice licensees being sole advisers, what are the risks and legal ramifications to consider when taking the plunge into self-licensing?
Despite its popularity, only 1 per cent of financial advisers say they have often discussed cryptocurrency with clients, CoreData said, fuelled by concerns of heavy legal expenses if the product goes wrong.
AFCA and the CSLR have signed a memorandum of understanding as to how they will support an efficient financial services sector via the scheme.
