Regulatory objectivity vital

financial planners financial planning association compliance ASIC financial planning commonwealth financial planning chairman association of financial advisers financial planning industry australian securities and investments commission macquarie financial advisers financial advice AFA government

5 December 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Editorial Comment

Much as a judge or magistrate has a duty to stay impartial when hearing matters which come before their courts, so too does a Commonwealth regulator have a duty to remain objective.

Thus, the sweeping and emotive language used about financial planners by the chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Greg Medcraft, in answering questions at the National Press Club last week was inappropriate and arguably raises questions about the regulator's ability to be seen as fair and objective.

Medcraft's seemingly emotive response to questions asked about financial planners is explicable in the context of a year during which much attention was focused on the enforceable undertakings imposed on Commonwealth Financial Planning and Macquarie, but seemed to ignore the manner in which those events were leveraged by the political forces who mounted the campaign against the Government's Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.

Further, intentionally or not, his comments served to tarnish the reputations of many highly ethical and hard-working financial planners while diminishing the achievements of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) in seeking to lift standards and rid the sector of bad apples.

Mr Medcraft is not a career public servant. If he were, he would likely have stuck to a carefully-prepared script and tempered any comments capable of giving rise to perceptions of bias.

The ASIC chairman is entitled to his personal views about the financial planning industry, but his comments at the National Press Club would be seen by many as having not only unfairly tarnished an entire profession but as having diminished his own office.

- Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

1 day 20 hours ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

2 days ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

3 days 16 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND