Red light from ACCC on NAB/AXA bid

ACCC financial planners peter kell axa asia pacific national australia bank

9 September 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has again blocked National Australia Bank's proposed acquisition of AXA Asia Pacific.

The ACCC said it maintained its initial opposition of the bid on the basis that NAB's revised bid, which included divesting AXA's North platform to IOOF, did not "provide sufficient certainty that the ACCC's competition concerns will be addressed".

The ACCC considered that IOOF did not have sufficient distribution capability to provide an effective competitive constraint on existing key players in the foreseeable future, and as such, competition, particularly in the retail investment platform space, would be constrained if NAB's proposed acquisition was allowed to proceed.

In announcing the decision ACCC deputy chairman Peter Kell said the Commission had considered NAB’s proposed undertakings and had received feedback regarding that proposal from a range of industry participants, including financial planners, dealer groups, investment product providers and other market participants.

“The majority of these participants raised concerns that the proposed undertakings would not provide for an effective competitive constraint on a merged NAB/AXA or other major platform providers,” Kell said.

Kell added the undertakings placed a “heavy reliance” on IOOF having sufficient distribution capability to provide the competition needed to quell the ACCC’s concerns.

However, Kell noted NAB’s undertaking did not include the distribution network of financial planners or the North products that currently support the North platform, therefore directly impacting the “ongoing viability and competitiveness of the divestiture business”.

The ACCC was also concerned that the undertakings were dependent on third parties to “complete certain actions, and involve complex and long term behavioural obligations that present risks”.

"The ACCC found that, together, these factors raised considerable uncertainty as to whether the proposed purchaser operating the North platform administration business would be able to provide an effective competitive constraint to a combined NAB-AXA, and thereby restore competition lost should the proposed acquisition proceed," Kell said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Gee

Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...

1 day 17 hours ago
Murray Wilkinson

In Australia this was the country of a "Fair Go". This Government is using us. We need direct action and we need to figh...

1 day 19 hours ago
mark mclennan

I am reading a lot about the unfairness of CSLR, QAR etc etc and it is clear that there is massive inequity taking place...

1 day 22 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND