Product intervention power will increase cost of advice
Handing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) product intervention powers could end up restricting advisers as a result of licensees limiting the number of offerings on approved product lists (APLs), according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).
In a submission filed with the Treasury this month, the AFA said it was concerned that the impact of this legislation would be a reduction in the breadth of APLs as licensees sought to avoid the unnecessary complexity that would arise in having a broad APL and where an adviser might want to recommend a non-approved product.
“The impact of this is a reduction in competition and choice for consumers,” it said.
The AFA also expressed concern about the manner in which the proposed product intervention power would impact the cost of providing financial advice, particularly where record-keeping and other administrative obligations were concerned.
“We note that the Regulatory Impact statement demonstrates a cost to business of $94.7 million, which is a significant reduction on the $239 million set out in the December 2017 version,” the submission said.
“We remain disappointed that there is a total lack of detail in terms of the breakdown of this $94.7 million and we are concerned that the majority of it will sit with distributors and financial advisers in particular,” it said.
The AFA said the cost increase from the legislation would come on top of a number of other recent regulatory-driven increases which would impact upon the cost of providing financial advice to Australian consumers and would therefore negatively influence access to financial advice for average Australians.
Recommended for you
Adviser willingness is the key hurdle to the uptake of ESG matters by financial advisers; they should not feel afraid or embarrassed if they are less familiar with what clients are seeking.
In his first move since the acquisition by Count, former Diverger managing director Nathan Jacobsen has taken up a new leadership role in the financial advice space.
Medical grounds are no excuse for compliance failures as a Victorian AFSL is sentenced for failing to lodge annual financial reports.
The balance of ASIC enforcement activity is skewed towards civil rather than criminal cases, but the corporate regulator says it is seeking to redress this balance.
