Obtaining PI is a problem and ASIC knows it
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has acknowledged the trouble some financial advisers are experiencing in obtaining professional indemnity (PI) insurance.
The acknowledgement is contained in ASIC’s latest report overviewing licensing and professional registration applications and represents one of the regulator’s first formal acknowledgements that obtaining PI coverage has become an increasing problem for advisers.
However, ASIC’s only advice to advisers who are experiencing problems obtaining PI is that they should start the process early to give themselves time to overcome any issues which would impact on their licensing.
“We are aware that some applicants are experiencing difficulty in obtaining PI insurance that meets the requirements specified in our regulatory guidance,” the ASIC document said.
It said that the problems it had identified including policies involving a significant excess compared to the premium and the complexity in PI policy terms and unacceptable exclusions to coverage.
“Given the difficulty some applicants are experiencing in obtaining adequate PI insurance, ASIC encourages applicants to engage with their proposed insurer as early as practicable to minimise potential delays associated in finalising a licence application,” the regulator said.
Recommended for you
Adviser willingness is the key hurdle to the uptake of ESG matters by financial advisers; they should not feel afraid or embarrassed if they are less familiar with what clients are seeking.
In his first move since the acquisition by Count, former Diverger managing director Nathan Jacobsen has taken up a new leadership role in the financial advice space.
Medical grounds are no excuse for compliance failures as a Victorian AFSL is sentenced for failing to lodge annual financial reports.
The balance of ASIC enforcement activity is skewed towards civil rather than criminal cases, but the corporate regulator says it is seeking to redress this balance.
