Master trusts outperform in July
Retail master trusts outperformed industry superannuation funds in July for the 13th time in 17 months, according to research house Chant West.
The outperformance of the retail funds again reflected their heavier exposure to listed investments when compared to industry funds, many of which have strong allocations towards unlisted investments including direct property.
According to Chant West principal Warren Chant the outperformance of the master trusts was based on the recovery of both international and domestic equities in July.
Despite this, he said that industry funds continued to hold an edge over the longer term, outperforming retail master trusts by 1.3 per cent a year.
The Chant West analysis revealed that the median growth superannuation fund delivered a return of 2.2 per cent in July with the main drivers being stronger US markets and a 4.5 per cent rise in the Australian share market.
However Chant warned that superannuation fund returns still had some way to go before they recovered to the levels experienced before the global financial crisis.
“While funds have rallied 22 per cent since the end of February 2009, they still need a further 13 per cent return from here to get back to the levels of late October, 2007,” he said.
Chant said this might take some time because economic data coming out of the US indicated a subdued outlook.
Recommended for you
The popularity of ETFs, which are approaching $200 billion in Australia, is a potential threat to the advice landscape if consumers opt to invest directly, according to this senior partner.
A former AMP financial adviser has urged advisers in the BOLR class action against AMP to object to the “unfair and unreasonable” $100 million settlement sum as the objection deadline approaches on 22 May.
Two Victoria-based financial advice practices have merged and rebranded as Forbes Fava Saville Financial Planning, as the firm realises the benefits of added scale.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made its latest ruling over a case involving an incorrect Statement of Advice.