Lobbying did not stall adviser education standards: ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has vehemently denied being swayed by lobbying groups to suspend its adviser competency push.
A media article this week alleged that a "confidential" letter from nine industry groups — including the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Financial Services Council (FSC) - encouraged the regulator to put its adviser education standards, laid out in consultation paper 212 and 215, on hold until the industry had time to address any changes in a holistic manner.
However, a spokesman for ASIC told Money Management there was no confidential letter, nor a pause on delivering standards due to lobbying.
"This letter was not a factor in ASIC's decision to put its work on CPs 212 and 215 on hold," he said.
Instead, he said the review of adviser competence announced by former Assistant Treasurer, Senator Arthur Sinodinos, was behind the decision to suspend CP 212.
"There are certain features of ASIC's preferred model to improve adviser training and competence (eg a mandatory national exam) that are best delivered through Parliamentary law reform," he said.
"In these circumstances it made sense for ASIC to put its review on hold pending Government consideration of the issue of adviser training and competence."
He also said ASIC published all submissions from industry groups on its website.
Recommended for you
With Fortnum Private Wealth and Professional Financial Services now unified under the Entireti umbrella company, CEO Neil Younger has detailed to Money Management the firm’s new direction and future expansion.
The FAAA has suggested looking offshore for overseas financial advisers to ease the adviser shortage, but are employers willing to take on the burden of workplace visas?
There may be a huge influx of alternatives coming to the market, but timing and access difficulties mean advisers can easily end up disappointed with their selection, according to Morningstar global CIO Dan Kemp.
An NSW individual has pleaded guilty to one criminal charge of providing unlicensed financial services after promoting crypto investments at national seminars.